Everytime you get PR people + communication technology people together – the conversation likely turns to the social media (press) release.
I’ll admit – I ask everyone I run into what they think about it & I read about the debate.
Some think it is the next big thing. Some don’t. Some aren’t happy when you don’t do it exactly the way the template was outlined. Some think the whole point is to be flexible and try.
I think the real scorecard lies in whether the people we send it to like it. Yes, the point is to encourage bloggers & other social media mavens to “re-mix” our content – but we still serve journalists.
And some don’t get it. Or like it.
At the ATL social media day, hosted by the PRSA Georgia chapter, a real-live journalist sat on the panel at the pre-lunch session talking about how to use social media tools.
So I asked him what he wanted. SM or traditional?
Much to my surprise, he was ambivalent about it.
But he did say that he appreciated the links to non-traditional coverage and others’ interest in an issue. He said if you’re pitching an item, & can prove that other people are already interested (meaning it is a legitimate story), then that will get more attention. He encouraged practitioners to include links to bloggers’ coverage in a pitch.
So who knows. I guess we have to keep working on it, because as a practitioner I don’t care if it is the traditional or the social media press release – I just want that message in that release to get to my publics (we’re not supposed to call them audiences anymore) and to engage them.